Privately, I am pro choice for first trimester abortion because I support bodily autonomy and because I know that the solid majority of women who have abortions end up either having the same amount of kids or more amount of kids a year to years after their abortion than if they would have had if they didn’t have their abortion in the first place. 

If I find out that that the solid majority of women who have abortions don’t end up having the same amount of kids or more amount of kids a year to years after their abortion than if they would have had if they didn’t have their abortion in the first place, here is what would happen

If I found that out to be true, I would still be privately, pro choice for first trimester abortion (because I support bodily autonomy), but I would after finding that out, privately call for policies that are aimed at increasing the birth rate (maybe even policies like the government giving tax breaks to families who have kids, and the more kids families they have, the more tax breaks they get)  

This would lead to more children being born so they can build the productive forces, under the assumption that more working forces will naturally lead to the type of left wing economic future that I want

Privately, I am between third political position pro choice and seventh political position on early term abortion with the view that early term abortion should be rare, safe and legal. 

Privately, I oscillate between being pro life in all but a name/lean pro choice for second trimester abortion and being generally and conditionally (generally and conditionally as mere formalities)  “pro choice” as well as “anti abortion” for second trimester abortions (“pro choice” as well as “anti abortion” means when I personally oscillate to this view, while I am personally pro choice for second trimester abortions, I privately want the government to reduce the number of second trimester abortions by increasing availability of other options instead of establishing regulations on second trimester abortion). 

Since I support bodily autonomy, personally I am Live and Let live (let live meaning live and let me and pro lifers live, not live and let the unborn baby live) Women’s Health Protection pro choice for mid term and early and mid late term abortions (for the health related reasons given in this PolitiFact article) .

Personally, I am closer to being pro life for third trimester abortion and mid to very late term abortion than I am to being pro choice for mid term abortion. This is partly because abortion rights in the third trimester and late term abortion of pregnancy are the bourgeois individualist line of the pro choice and are thus revisionism. 


Legality wise I believe that no rights exist for unborn babies or infants until they are created by contract. Unborn babies are property of their parents until they are born and sign a contract. So legality wise I am pro choice for all three trimesters and terms since the mother’s rights are all that matters . If the unborn baby can sign a contract and shed their rights, legality wise I would be pro life from that point forward even if the baby signs that contract in the first trimester or term


Legality wise, I am pro choice for first trimester and early term abortion because I support bodily autonomy and because I realize that banning early term abortion won’t stop early term abortions (but would make them unsafe since they wouldn’t be legal)



This is because I support bodily autonomy and because I know

Women’s Health Protection regulates abortion after viability and allows abortion for the protection and health of the mother for mid term and early to mid late term abortions. The mother would play a key role in the decision, but with equal responsibility in the hands of the physician.

I would like the Women’s Health Protection for mid term and early to mid late term abortion to make the regulation of abortion after viability involve hospital like regulation in order to keep patients safe along with incentivizing only doctors performing mid term and early to mid late term abortions,

Though not a deal breaker, I still would strongly prefer if the Women’s Health Protection Act made the MENTAL health of the mother not be used as the only reason in aborting the baby in the mid term and early to mid late term (though I am ok with it being used as a secondary factor for extreme cases) and made non health, non rape and non incest not be used as a  reason in aborting the baby in the mid term and early to mid late term

I advocate for a period of reflection for mid term and early to mid late term abortions under the Women’s Health Protection Act to help women avoid hasty decisions in a moment of panic to record that mid term and early to mid late term abortion are not and should not never be a trivial act. So legality wise I want mid term and early to mid late term abortions to be rare safe and legal

Legality wise I am pro life for third trimester abortion and very late term abortion . This is because third trimester abortion and very late term abortion are Fascism and late term Capitalism

I believe that women in the US should have easy access to Misoprostol for up to the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, especially to abort babies that they conceived via rape or incest so they don’t have to go through with the humiliation of going to an abortion doctor to get it done

Personally and legality wise, I am pro choice for abortion in the first two trimesters and first two terms for cases of rape and incest because I support womens reproductive healthcare and when women are victims of rape or incest it is a serious health issue for the woman in every sense of the word

Personally I am radically indifferent on third trimester and late term abortion for rape, incest and to save the life of the mother. 

However, I would personally be actively pro choice on mothers having abortions for third trimester and late term abortion for rape and incest only if the following happens. 

That those mothers seeking third trimester and late term abortions ,through mutual aide, private donations etc helped legal and illegal migrants with their healthcare in the same way that Gavin Newsom helped legal and illegal migrants with their healthcare in his healthcare reform in 2022, along with petitioning to get people taken off death row, and helped make anti vaxxers become pro vaxxers. 

If these conditions are not met, then I remain personally radically indifferent on third trimester and late term abortion for rape, incest and to save the life of the mother. 

Legality wise I am begrudgingly pro choice on third trimester and early to mid late term abortion for rapr and incest 

Legality wise, I am sixth political position for very late term abortion for rape and incest 

Personally and legality wise, I am pro life for partial birth abortion and live birth abortion even if the baby was conceived by rape or incest. Babies who survive an abortion should get medical care even if they were conceived by rape or incest.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My real ethnicity views

I don’t find the race concept to be useful. I tend to use African American and black interchangeably in this blog  From Rationalwiki “ Modern scientific consensus is strongly against the race concept, though this was not always the case. In contrast, biological evidence for racialism has always been relatively weak, and modern evidence conclusively shows that racialism is fundamentally flawed. Scientific consensus: Races aren't useful “”[B]oundaries in global variation are not abrupt and do not fit a strict view of the race concept; the number of races and the cutoffs used to define them are arbitrary. The race concept is at best a crude first-order approximation to the geographically structured phenotypic variation in the human species. —biological anthropologist John Relethford in 2009 Major institutions with expertise have come down against the biological usefulness of race: “”DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. W...
Read more

Exh reliyvnn

 I am ok with the lifestyles of straight people and LGBTQ people being out in the open as long as that out in the open behavior is ideally (but not a deal breaker) family friendly (especially no kink, no mass public indecency and no criminal acts) Personally I am against marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) without  commitment  and that infringe on other people’s rights Personally I am  fifth political position  on marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) without  commitment  but that don’t that infringe on other people’s rights Personally, I am indifferent to marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages) with  commitment  but that infringe on other people’s rights Personally I support marriages (straight marriages and same sex marriages)  commitment  and that don’t infringe on other people’s rights  I would prefer that all marriages (Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage and R...
Read more

Exh econmc

Unlike in China, there would be a People’s Democracy which would allow multiclass and multi party democracy along the path to socialism.  Low class, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie would also be allowed to participate in this greater proletarian movement that would be determined by and part of a broad social base that would underline peaceful socialist revolutions. This is because the People’s Democracy recognizes that the working class are not necessarily an impediment, and could be used to mobilize and serve as the basis for building a state that as mentioned below has corporatist elements that would align labor interests with at least a large sect of the national bourgeoisie to promote a Civic Patriotic Collectivism-Communitarian agenda as mentioned below   Leadership positions would be held by the Communist and labor parties, to build more cohesion these parties would merge with our Social Democrat parties on the basis of Marxism Leninism In a  Post Den...
Read more