Exh queerviews

Queer views

When I use the term gay and queer in this blog, I am talking about homosexuals, bisexuals and lesbians, etc, except as noted otherwise

I am pro LGBTQ (I am Heteroflexible curious) and LGBTQ people have a right to do what they do,  since the government should never dictate what people do privately or civilly . The government has no right to dictate our lives. 

I am inclusive toward LGBTQ people and I want them to be left alone , free of harassment. I will always stand with the LGBTQ community against discrimination 

You are gay? Cool, It doesn't matter. It is OK to be Gay.

Systematically and subconsciously I want the word marriage in the term same sex marriage to be changed to a different word that shows that same sex marriage is more real/legal and moral than straight marriage and have new things added to same sex marriage ceremonies to show that same sex weddings are more legit and moral than straight weddings.

Then systematically and subconsciously I would want more rights for married same sex couples that they and straight couples currently don't have now (to show that same sex marriage is the ideal form of marriage and to show that same sex marriage is on a higher hierarchy of marriage than straight marriage without taking anything away from straight marriage ceremonies or rights). 

Legality wise, I am pragmatically Live and Let Live on same sex marriage being legal, partly for these reasons, these reasons and these reasons and because I am an Anarcho Libertarian and free love is a current within Anarchism

I support individual persons, whether heterosexual/homosexual/lesbian who are cohabiting/single to be able to adopt children 

I am against Heterophobia. There is nothing wrong or oppressing about being Heterosexual. If you are Heterophobic, stop focusing on that petty thing and focus on what matters

I do not support Hetereosexism . Down with Hetereosexism

I want to abolish the heterosexual/heteronormative patriarchy so people’s sexual orientation no longer matter

I am a supporter of Queer Anarchism. and its social insurrection mission to abolish the state and capitalism with the anarchist ideal of complete individual freedom as a method of liberation for the   LGBTQ community which would then lead to the abolition of homophobia, transphobia, heteronormativity, patriarchy, and the gender binary.

I also love the "Be gay, do crime" slogan.  That slogan is anti neoliberal and anti authoritarian and it implies that gays doing criminal and incivil acts may be necessary to obtain equal rights for gays everywhere (since being gay is still criminalized in many places around the world)  

Queer Anarchists can trace this type of bold method back to the Stonewall riots where gay protestors back then used the same methods to try to obtain equal rights for gays

I also support the Max Stirner inspired brand of Queer Anarchism . I support their notion of (and embracing) radical individualism that is influenced by individual philosophers like Max Stirner. 

In particular I support Queer Anarchists using Max Stirner’s non-systematic approach, radicalism and direct action. I like how queer anarchists organized and played a major role  in the WTO protests and anti-globalization movement. 

I am apolitical to the Straight pride movement . I don’t know enough about them to form an opinion of their movement. They are so insignificant , I refuse to acknowledge them. Some former gays are part of that movement too.  

I recognize that some good-faith (big tent) opinions (including from the WalkAway movement) on this issue are different but whatever.

I believe that gays can become straight (Anne Heche did as did and do many others).  I support and celebrate the choice of gays and straights being anything they want to be. Freedom of choice is a good thing. I expand on a similar point, in this link here, and see this post I made for a similar point on gay identity 

While I am pro LGBTQ, I feel that LGBTQ rights​ are used by neoliberals and neocons to justify the US and NATO’s imperialism and those neoliberals and neocons are wrong to do that. Imperialism is wrong

For example, Zionists and neoliberals and neocons criticize Palestine for being ‘homophobic’ and for their non gay friendly laws. The neoliberals and neocons use that to justify helping he occupiers (Israel) to oppress (ymmv) the Palestinians. I sort of echo this article

There is no liberation without LGBTQ liberation. However, neoliberals forcing pro LGBTQ policies on homophobic countries is bad because it will make the LGBTQ movement be associated with western imperialism.

This will be counterproductive and cause anti LGBTQ sentiment due to the LGBTQ movement wrongly being associated with Imperialism. This will basically violate the West’s do no harm principal in ways the West never imagined in the global south. 

Let’s hope the US adheres to a strict Do no harm principle so maybe this US LGBTQ imperialism won’t backfire on LGBTQ people and won’t be so blatant

Instead we (the left) should work with our global south allies while accepting they might be homophobic at times. 

We can point out to those homophobes it is wrong to be homophobic in our spaces, but we can’t and should not force them to be better while we do show them that we ( the left) will work with them to fight imperialism and that we accept the LGBTQ community etc  

A part of my subconscious feels that LGBTQ being too open about their sexuality ,mainly with the kink and similar non family friendly things is not ideal since that wrongly makes the LGBTQ an ‘interest group’ 

In that part of my subconscious, I feel that destabilizes anti LGBTQ countries and can lead to counterproductive color revolutions. This is class essentialism . 

This would make it harder to liberate LGBTQ people in those countries since those countries would remain capitalist/Neoliberal and anti LGBTQ instead of becoming socialist and thus reigning in economic egalitarianism (and ultimately sexual orientation equality) for LGBTQ people as socialism usually does

This would apply to straights too but straights already have universal rights so straights can be open without being an interest group or destabilizing socialist revolutions.  

Being LGBTQ was acceptable and common in the Americas (like Second Spirit in First Nations pre Canada) and Asia before European imperialism and colonialism criminalized LGBTQ acts in those countries and thus set off centuries of hetereosexist , Anti LGBTQ laws and cultural views. So we must defeat Imperialism and Colonialism once and for all to liberate the LGBTQ

Some people feel that is highly questionable for the EU or US etc to try to force morality like LGBTQ issues on Eastern European countries or non pro LGBTQ countries using economic pressure or military tactics. That could be seen as Western imperialism and as a non pragmatic approach to helping to liberate LGBTQ people in other countries . 

LGBTQ people are humans not political pawns . Playing around with their lives through political games by the West is a loss for everyone

It is wrong our tax dollars go toward overseas LGBTQ operations instead of infrastructure, welfare at home etc. That is is western imperialism and thus wrong. The US has no fight to tell other countries how to act on social issues

A strong letter to Joseph Stalin on LGBTQ rights can be found here

The whole biological argument (i.e that same sex marriage is somehow bad because the couples cannot naturally reproduce) against same sex marriage is faulty and also hypocritical

Infertile straights, are one in sixteen people, which is practically the same as some estimates of gay people

So if someone is against same sex marriage because of the biological argument, they would have to also be against straight marriage if one of the spouses in those straight marriages is infertile

The love wins everywhere message is creative and edgy it really is but that message is a bit excessive and to some fellow LGBTQ activists unnecessarily ‘provocative’ (ymmv)

I support the Gay Shame movement .  Seeing gays sell out by hereosexualizing themselves through marrying within a heterosexist patriarchal marriage system was a lot to take but I quickly accepted that as can be seen throughout this post and blog;  same sex couples have a right to be as miserable as straight married couples have always been /s 

It is just that I always respected how gays were unique and didn't want to follow social norms. 

I am sympathetic to supportive of the Gay Shame movement’s hesitancy of queer mainstreaming, to their demands of the abolishment of state sanctioned coupling (marriage for people of all sexual orientations ie hetereo and gay) since I like them see marriage as an exploitation at the benefit of others, and believe that people shouldn't have to do a ritualistic things like get married to get benefits like healthcare and the like . 

I feel that gays are sadly being used by Liberal 2.0ers as stepping stones to further their own selves and party and such gay saviorism is an insult to gays. Liberal 2.0ers also use gays as background objects to fill their diversity quotas/fetishes or to make themselves look 'moral' which also triggers me.

I further sympathize with their views that gay marriage and voting are only hollow things that reinforce the patriarchal structure instead of changing or blowing up those patriarchal structures and allowing people of all sexual orientations a fresh new and equal start. 

Basically unless we abolish or radically change marriage for everyone, gay marriage is only a hollow victory. It is ok to be gay

The whole concept of the bourgeois dividing people by their sexual orientation ('straight', 'queer i.e gay', 'bisexual') is what they use to enslave people of all sexual orientations. We need to abolish labeling people by sexual orientation, and stop labeling sexual orientations

This is because things like :queer fluidity, queer curiosity, queer flexibility, hetero fluidity, hetero curiosity, hetero flexibility,  bi fluidity, bi curiosity, bi flexibility, gender non conforming and their relationships and similar post sexual orientation things are becoming more and more common. 

Because of that and the fact that the lines between sexual orientations are becoming less and less defined and different, there is no need to label people as 'straight' 'queer i.e gay' ,'bi sexual' etc 

Moreover, educating gays bi sexuals etc about what I wrote above, can help them realize they don't have to be Pidgeon holed into one LGBTQ+ box and can be free to explore whatever is best for them. This will make people of all sexual orientations productive members of our society creating a working class conscious. 

No more, will gays or bi sexual people have to beer the stigma of being labeled 'queer/gay' or 'bi sexual', since there will no clear boundary between the many types of sexual orientations, which are all becoming less and less defined. This will send a message to the bourgeoisie that them dividing us by sexual orientation has ended. 

This is because on the social level, the reappropriation of life, in addition to its full reappropriation on the individual level, people of all sexual orientations will have stopped identifying essentially in terms of their sexual preference social identities.

This is basically Queer neutrality/queer anti-identitarianism which I support (Like the gay shame movement, coalitions of queer neutrality like Queer Nation set aside their identity differences in order to team up against assimilationist movements). Think of it as an undoing of the structural logics of the indexical trace and the rhetorical apostrophe 

For example, the band Queen, in the 2018 film Bohemian Rhapsody when someone asks front man Freddy Mercury (played by Rami Malek), “What makes Queen any different from all of the other wannabe rock stars I meet?” Freddy Mercury responds,

“I’ll tell you what it is. We are four misfits who don’t belong together, playing to the other misfits: the outcasts right at the back of the room who are pretty sure they don’t belong either. We belong to them”

This depiction of the queer community as not belonging and yet belonging to those who do not belong is anti-identitarian because it crosses genders/genres and interrupts the boundaries of communication.

More from Freddy Mercury “We’ll mix genres, we’ll cross boundaries, we’ll speak in bloody tongues if we want to” (Bohemian Rhapsody). Queer neutrality is supposed to be a condition of relation without any determinate representational or indexical tie, especially the ties of social categories, associational boundaries, and personal identities that shape conventional relations.

John Paul Ricco states a queer-neutral anti-methodology in his The Logic of the Lure (2002) book, where he writes “What if we neither began nor ended with identity? In the end, what if we were to substitute something like a cruising ground for an epistemological ground”

The above changes will liberate all homophobes, biphobes and heterophobes from their homophobia, biphobia and heterophobia . The above changes will also help people not end up like this former liberal by making it impossible to be homophobic, biphobic or heterephobic in the first place

Judith/Jack Halberstam’s Queer Art of Failure (2011) builds upon antisocial impersonality by further developing an idea of queer impersonality as “radically passive masochism,” that Queer people can relate to one another in their anticlimactic and destructive nonrelations to them/selves. 

Halberstam reinvigorates the cruising fetish for Queer people by making the utility of getting lost over finding their way attractive, and so Queer people should conjure a Benjaminian stroll or a situationist flow, an ambulatory journey through the unplanned, unexpected, improvised, and surprising

I echo every point that Suzanna Danuta Walters made in the II. BEYOND GUNS AND TAFFETA chapter of her book ‘The Few, The Proud, The Gays: Don't Ask, Don't Tell and the Trap of Tolerance’

I'm absolutely not happy when Western corporations use rainbow symbols to pretend that they support solidarity with LGBTQ people while said corporations support imperialism and neocolonialism. I echo what Suzanna Dunata Walters said in the piece here. I also echo this meme on this

I am tempted to say that I blindly sort of want gays to retroactively have the same rights and freedom from ‘discrimination’ in BC times through the late 20th century that gays in the US and Canada have now and in the future. 

Where same sex marriage was one of the US’s original, founding era understanding of what marriage is and where the US constitution on same sex marriage from the 18th century onward was always like it has been since 2015 .

Though the right for same sex couples to marry could always be found in the Constitution since the late 18th century if someone wanted to decipher it, it wasn’t deciphered to permit same sex marriage until 2015) . Moreover, this quote from Barry Goldwater “ I am pretty secure in feeling that discriminating against gays is constitutionally wrong.” , further solidifies that line of reasoning

My reason is, if being gay was and is always as normal and accepted as being straight was and is always normal and accepted, there wouldn't be any homophobes or anti gay resentment in the 20th century or 21st century since in that world, being gay (like straight) would be seen as traditional and normal and thus there would be one less excuse for anti gay people to be anti gay

I support the Respect for Marriage Act to go codify same sex marriage and interracial marriage and I am cool with the compromises.

I like this act because it seems to be the first step toward getting the government out of the marriage business (since I want the government to be removed from the marriage business since I feel that marriage is a private matter) 

That act also retroactively makes the Constitution support same sex marriage and interracial marriage by codifying that into the Constitution. 

Though as mentioned elsewhere, those rights were already found to have always existed in the Constitution, but codification , well that goes the extra mile has the state protect those rights which is base. Moreover marrying whoever you want is a natural right

I oppose Rick Perry's anti gay early 2010s law which is harsh , stigmatizing and uncompassionate. People who are Anti gay should stop focusing on petty things (like people being gay) and focus on what matters

I am fine with the repeal of DADT (especially for Libertarian reasons). The IDF and Kurds have gays in their militaries and are great militaries  https://books.google.com/books?id=VMZHuyK5NTsC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA64#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Gay activists fought to end DADT with the argument that gays in the military will only enhance unit cohesion and military readiness by permitting openness and—importantly— utilizing all willing soldiers in ,unbeknownst to them, the global battle to wrongly make the world safe for heteronormativity and unfettered Capitalism (when they should be battling to end heteronormativity and Capitalism instead of battling to protect those injustices)

The argument that ultimately won was that the military (and the nation)—were suffering due to gay exclusion, as evidenced by the selective “stop loss” actions, when gays were deemed too essential to discharge over a dumb policy and by the loss of so many Arab translators.

Or to put in another way, discrimination against gays is not just bad in a moral sense; it is actually seen as bad for national security and the economy. 

So gays were wrongly used as new shiny weapons by the military to increase the effectiveness of the military instead of simply letting them join for the right reasons. 

When we destroy the heterosexual patriarchy/heteronormativity naturally in a non hierarchal manner it will naturally help gays to blend in without notice since sexual orientation wouldn’t matter at that point

Some of my other views on DADT are reflected in this book 

I privately think schools from k-8 should teach the basics like the 3 Rs, history etc with family friendly mentions of LGBTQ only in Social Studies classes or if their teacher is LGBTQ. Remember kids can and will learn about LGBTQ+ easily online or through books or through Hollywood

I will just say that parents who don't want their kids to learn LGBTQ+ things in school should homeschool their children or have them go to a private school. Let kids be kids

I am against kids in preschool and k-4 school being taught these type of things. That type of teaching has no place in preschool and elementary schools. Kids aren’t mature enough to digest those type of things. Parents need to get on school boards to correctly stop this stuff from being taught in those grades to such impressionable minds 

I plead the fifth on whether I believe kids in grades 5-7 should be taught those type of things. 

A lot of Muslim parents get offended by that and Muslims have endured enough since 9/11 that we may have to bite the bullet for them on that. I also am sympathetic to the progressive pro gay activists who got the lgbtq+ teaching removed from that NC school since they are removing that lgbtq+ teaching for a liberal ,pro gay reason. 

Despite what I wrote above, I agree with this idea from this parent , here is a snipet 

“One of the most amazing things about cisgender straight people is that most of them think they don’t have a sexual orientation or a gender identity. A major premise of Florida’s recently passed “Don’t Say Gay” bill is that children should be sheltered from discussions of sexual orientation, and in many ways, I, a queer mom married to a woman, actually agree with this. That also goes for gender identity too ― I think it would be amazing if schools stopped teaching gender as an innate expression stemming from what is in one’s pants. And I believe young children can learn all about love and family and different family structures without needing to have it framed in ways that are overly sexual or romantic. But that’s not how straight society likes to play.”

The ironic twist regarding this legislation is that mainstream straight culture enjoys aggressively (hetero)sexualizing young children in ways that, if LGBTQ people did it, we would be labeled perverts, extremists and child abusers. And yet heterosexual grooming ― a term I coined for this phenomenon ― is so constant and ubiquitous most people don’t even notice it.”

I really don’t want to criticize Florida's new anti grooming law or similar school laws. But I will.

I don’t believe Ron Desantis should control what kids learn or don’t learn in school. He is a governor not a  school board president and he should not have passed his authoritarian law. We need to find ways to stop governors of all states from intruding in the lives of our students in schools. 

Ron Desantis was bold and passionate (or unhinged) , which if he converts to Leftism will be great traits to have to spread Left Wing policies

However, if the bill can be tweeked, to fix some concerns outlined here, I can live with the end result and I can endure that law by Desantis and hope good comes from it for everyone

More than 48 percent of DC LGBTQ+ youth have seriously considered suicide over the past year and percentages across the country aren’t far off. 

We have to help LGBTQ not even consider suicide. To do this, we need to use our spirits, minds and hearts along with an all hands on deck approach to do so. Like maybe donate money to mental health charities and marginalized peoples charities which help poor and, marginalized people and by extension LGBTQ people who have such issues.  

I support protecting the dignity and security of elderly LGBTQ people through spirit filled humanity and love to help bridge the gap for them between Earth and the afterlife, along with easier access for STD care, Mushroom legalization for LGBTQ elderly people and the creation and expansion of LGBTQ retirement communities (like Gavin Newsom would want to create and expand) . 

I also support predistrubition for elderly LGBTQ people. Elderly LGBTQ are a unique asset to our communities 

Since I am Libertarian I am against adoption centers being forced to have anti gay adoption discrimination laws.  I feel the best way to deal with such homophobic adoption centers is to have people boycott them them in a Libertarian way which is a better tactic in this case. 

I am passively against gay conversion therapy being banned since I am a Libertarian (and for slippery slope reasons). 

The government has no right to play moral cop on gay conversion therapy. If the government of the US changed from a Democratic Constitutional Republic to a Moral Dictatorship or Moralocracy, or if we had a direct democracy, then I would be mixed to supportive of banning gay conversion therapy

Making it illegal unregulates it and drives it underground, but if its legal it is regulated and safe

I help LGBTQ people through me supporting economic egalitarianism which will help them get true equality and protecting LGBTQ people from abuse 

I am copying this from Marxists.org because I agree with the jist of it so I want to echo it , I want want the things below to become a reality in our society one day:

The struggle against sexual discrimination is linked to the struggle against class society in general for multiple reasons. 

The first reason is that only the abolition of class society can create the material economic basis and cultural drive that is sufficient to dismantle the model of the monogamous family as the only basic unit of society (even if after these post family collectives lead to new type of nuclear family units) . 

By socially carrying out all of the tasks that are assigned today to the family sphere, and mostly to women (cooking, cleaning, raising children), and by allowing the free development of individuals with access to the best material and cultural resources that society can provide, it will be possible to facilitate a process by which interpersonal and family bonds are gradually freed from material necessity and correspond solely to romantic and sexual desire, thereby dissolving the oppressive norms and discriminations that exist in such relationships at present.   

But I would also more than ideally want decentralized free association to also replace the family unit

The second reason is that the solid majority of LGBTQ people are workers, youth, temporary workers, unemployed, who experience a double oppression in regard both to their class, in the workplace and living or surviving conditions, and their identity or sexual orientation. 

Joining in these struggles against those two forms of oppression is therefore the most natural thing, especially when we realize that the enemy is the same. 

Furthermore, it shouldn’t be forgotten that anti gay prejudices are also fostered to divide workers – like to make heterosexual workers believe that, while they may be oppressed, they are still superior to the gay person (how satisfying!), in the same way that racist prejudices are nurtured. The role played by the right wing in this process is self-evident.

Whoever says that the two fronts of struggle should be separated is playing into the enemy's hands. As it is often, in the LGBTQ movement, those people who promote this stance are wealthy individuals who don’t experience the material problems that are faced by LGBTQ workers and youth.

Marxism rightfully defends the peoples unity across all gender and sexual lines in the fight against the oppressive Capitalist system. 

But the Queer Theory holds that our gender and sexual identities are a fiction that is produced by discourses and oppressive power in our society: a learned performance. What does this idea mean for the liberation struggle? Is Queer Theory compatible with Marxism? 

In this talk, recorded at this year's International Marxist University, Yola Kipcak from Der Funke (Austrian section of the IMT) tackles these issues and explains the position of Marxists towards Queer Theory and the struggle against oppression

https://www.marxist.com/marxism-vs-queer-theory.htm    The Queer Theory believers that everyone worldwide has always done the exact opposite of what the Straight White Man does

.If we make the US and rest of the world like this, we will no longer have overkill idpol (or even halfway overkill idpol) or bigotry and our world will totally be free and equal. This will liberate sexist, homophobes and transphobes from their bigotry and prevent people from ending up like this former liberal on these issues  

I support that and gender acceleration . Gender Acceleration and the Queer Theory would make the logic of gender broken to the point where someone can freely and safely come out as trans without having to worry about being ostracised from society.

In the Judeo Christian bible, it is often said (by Immanuel) “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” He points to the disciples and says, “Here are my mother and my brothers. For whoever does the will of my father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.”

I support abolishing the nuclear family as the norm. This would lead more people being able to find equal alternatives to the nuclear family

While I am ok if this naturally leads to the nuclear family being completely abolished , I am against abolishing the nuclear family by coercion or force (since abolishing the nuclear family completely by coercion or force is authoritarianism and a violation of non aggression principle, personal autonomy and other Left Libertarianism and Anarchism core values), 

In the above ‘post nuclear family societies’  I would be fine with families still being traditional if they voluntarily choose to be that way (no one would stop them from being like that, since Left Libertarianism and Anarchism are the opposite of Authoritarianism)

In the above ‘post nuclear family societies’ , I would be fine with people still getting married if they wanted to do so voluntarily (see relation section way below)

Peter Kropotkin would never support completely abolishing the nuclear family by force 

Abolishing the Nuclear family completely coercion or by force goes against Karl Marx's distinction that he made between personal property as your own stuff, and "private property" as code for the privatized/enclosed means of producing goods and services.

As a self-respecting Left Libertarian/Anarchist, I would never demand the complete abolition of something (the nuclear family) that my family, friends and neighbors participate in freely

I would never demand to completely abolish a thing like the nuclear family which is at the core of so many cultures' daily lives

I also concede that, marriage, family, and childhood, all wrongfully or rightfully have a solid universal basis across many cultures. The form changes, but the core remains. To try to abolish any of these by (at least by coercion or force) instead of only abolishing them as the norm is to attempt to abolish a core piece of humanity.

To completely abolish the nuclear family by coercion or force, would be some corrosive heirarchical elitism. I just want a society that elevates other options as equal alternatives to the nuclear family, and to abolish the nuclear family as the norm. 

So while, I'm no fan of the nuclear family, I'm not going to judge people for being more comfortable with that sort of lifestyle. But I would also more than ideally want decentralized free association to also replace the family unit

If through this abolishing the nuclear family as a norm , the nuclear family was eventually naturally completely abolished, it would be problematic but I would be ok with that and it still wouldn’t be too radical: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/want-to-dismantle-capitalism-abolish-the-family/.  Also see this

I support the Queer Theory , but this author on the Race and Neutrality in the Queer theory says how the Queer theory is too white ethnocentric. This also plays into my Queer theory views

The Queer Theory challenges the notion that heterosexual desire is ‘normal’. 

The Queer theory explores and challenges how we perpetrate gender- and sex-based binaries, and its goal is to undo hierarchies and to fight against social inequalities.

The Queer Theory can be seen as a site of ‘collective contestation’. Some people suggest that the term ‘queer’ should never be ‘fully owned, but always and only redeployed, twisted, queered from a prior usage and in the direction of urgent and expanding political purposes’.

This flexibility allows for the consistent readjustment of the queer theory to accommodate the experiences of people who face marginalisation and discrimination on account of their sexuality and gender'.

This why I also support Xenofeminism since it is a way to achieve this

Xenofeminism uses tech to abolish gender, dislodging gender from ‘power’ and allows feminists to use the master’s tools to rebuild life. This also has an-anti naturalist element to it

From the Xenofeminist handbook:

"XF is vehemently anti-naturalist. Essentialist naturalism reeks of theology–the sooner it is exorcised, the better.".  "We want neither clean hands nor beautiful souls, neither virtue nor terror. We want superior forms of corruption.".  "Let a hundred sexes bloom!".     "Our lot is cast with technoscience, where nothing is so sacred that it cannot be reengineered and transformed so as to widen our aperture of freedom, extending to gender and the human." "Hormones hack into gender systems"

The Queer theory links universalization with queer . The preference for the term “queer” over the term “lesbian” and “gay” “represents, a bold impulse of generalization since it rejects a minoritizing logic of toleration or simple political interest representation in favor of a more thorough resistance to regimes of the normal. 

While queer theory has been a critical and theoretical discourse that is dedicated to questioning, resisting, and refusing the binary logics and structures that dominant understandings of gender and sexuality have been shaped, never the less, the virtual majority of this discourse continues to be expressed in terms of sameness and difference—a commanding binary structural logic that is especially potent in its ability to exclude, hierarchize, and totalize. 

I am against Lesbian Erasure. It's wrong for people to try to get Lesbians to transition to males, gender non conforming or to become fluid. 

That is wrong, hypocritical and against the values of our society.  I want Lesbians to get more visibility  within the LGBTQ movement, and be treated as equal to Homosexuals. There is nothing wrong with women being Lesbians.  I oppose the 'cotton ceiling' and the pressure on lesbians to have sex with men. 

Queer Neutrality unites Homosexuals and Lesbians and prevents Lesbian Erasure. Why Queer?, Queer, unlike gay, does not mean male. Furthermore when spoken to other gays and lesbians it is a way of suggesting they close ranks and forget (temporarily) their individual differences because they face a more insidious common enemy.

Queer neutrality expands from a gender-neutral coalition into an identity-neutral or impersonal coalition, with this expansion destabilizing the boundaries of the umbrella term “queer” in so much that it subsumes in a coalition of any non-normative identities (at the time) which as mentioned above includes lesbian, gay, but also bisexual, multiple ts (like transsexual, transvestite, transgender) and an inconsistent (and contested) combo of some of the following sexual and/or gender identities:

Q (questioning), Q (queer as a vague non-heterosexual identity), I (intersex), A (asexual), A (allied heterosexual), F (fetish – often shorthand for BDSM), U (undecided – replaces Q/questioning to make the palatable acronym QUILTBAG), 2S (two spirits), P (pansexual), etc

Queer neutrality stresses the interrelatedness of different, and occasional conflicting, communities and thus emphasizes the need to combine forces in our various antihomophobic and antisexist endeavors

However about the term Queer. Outside personhood. Lee Edelman writes, “queerness can never define an identity; it can only ever disturb one” . Again, “queerness could never constitute an authentic or substantive identity, but only a structural position determined by the imperative of figuration”

These are the causes that Edelman gives in support of his claim that queerness attains its ethical value exactly as far as it accedes to that place (of abjection conveyed in the stigma) accepting its figural status as resistance to the feasibility of the social while insisting on the inextricability of such resistance from all social structures.

Tim Dean molds his impersonal ethics of contact that is found in cruising culture in his Unlimited Intimacies: Reflections on the Subculture of Barebacking book where he writes “The alternative to what I’m calling the politics of identification is an impersonal ethics in which one cares about others even when one cannot see anything of oneself in them”

I retroactively nostalgically see the Continental Baths from the 1970s as something unique (in a good way) and a treasure  even though I am against the nudity/almost nudity, adulterous and pro drug aspect (and if any abuse happened there I retroactively condemn the Baths outright) . I was too young to go there in the mid to late 1970s and I am glad I never went since I would have been too young.

Children networks should not be teaching kids about Drag Queens. Shame on Nickelodeon for their indoctrination of our kids with that stuff. 

Children should not be drag queens as allowing them to do that sexualizes them. Children should not be allowed to go to Drag Queen shows, even ‘family friendly’ drag queen shows. ALL adult drag queen shows should be as family friendly as they claim drag queen shows for kids are family friendly.

Drag queens stereotype and objectify women and teach children to do so which makes it harder to destroy the patriarchy . Exposure to Drag queens sexualizes children etc, so we have to stop this

I also am against drag queen shows for kids because drag queen shows for kids are a trendy thing and I am  against trendy things. What is with the Liberal 2.0’s new weird, twisted hard on for drag queens that they have to shove them down our freaking throats? 

Let’s never forget that for all the favorable work that the HRC does for the LGBTQ community, that the HRC wrongly gave an award to Goldman Sachs right after the foreclosure crisis 

Liberal 2.0ers are now making shirts which say “the 2 places you can’t say gay Florida and Russia”. That is the state if the modern Liberal 2.0ers are in today. 

The pride coalition between the RNC and the Log Cabin Republicans does more harm than good for the Log Cabin Republicans .This is because that pride coalition grifts the Log Cabin Republicans fundraising and weakens the effectiveness of the Log Cabin Republicans