Exh wikipdts

Wikipedia has at least a somewhat Liberal 2.0 bias. But I have seen enough Wikipedia articles on politics to know they that Wikipedia is not a Liberal 2.0 echo chamber . As per Wikipedia user Pudeo , Wikipedia is a lot less Liberal 2.0 bias than Big Tech, Reddit etc. Wikipedia goes left and Right of Liberalism 2.0 but it is Liberal 2.0 (until I decide to move Wikipedia left or right myself)

Wikipedia has so many political articles, that if you find a Liberal 2.0 bias in one article you can find a non Liberal 2.0 counter bias on that very same subject in a more obscure article on that subject that isn’t as heavily monitored

Wikipedia barely had a (proto) Liberal 2.0 or Liberal 2.0 bias in the 2000s decade

Wikipedia has many international versions so there will be less Liberal 2.0 bias in those Wikis

Wikipedia has cabals of biased Liberal 2.0 users . Here are some bias Liberal 2.0 fanchilds:

Aquillion (he or she is named after an enemy and boss from Final Fantasy. Aquillion is an enemy of non Liberal 2.0 users

Carrite (shoe salesman, drama monger, lives in dreary Oregon, funny at times)

Drmies : Drmies is an Auburn football fanatic, professor, who uses Wikipedia like it is social media. He is from the Netherlands and moved to Alabama of all places years back. Drmies plays favorites. He protects his buddies (like El C, EEng) and blocks his enemies

Galobtter: Power hungry hat collector and an aggressive user. Though despite that he is solid ok as editor.

Goodday a Wikipedia cultist who sucks up to power users. Give Goodday the tools already. 

Grayfall: Old Wikipedian and angry mastadon who loves to get vandals blocked and thinks Wikipedia is his/her paint studio. Grayfall’s parents must have had a lot of misery raising him/her as a child since evrn as a kid Grayfall was an annoying, possessive, power hungry menace. Probably was a geek too

Muboshgu   A Derek Jeter stan who likes Jeter’s wood. Mubo uses sabremetrics on political articles. Also has a bit of an attitude. Mubo would say I am a Left Wing populist. He wants Wikipedians to scale the Wikipedia mountain but maybe Muboshgu should do so solo and stay up there so other users can get a turn editing in the news and baseball articles. Muboshgu also is secretly a Red Sox fan and he/she likes news rubbernecking

MrX (a toxic editor who is complains more than edits. MrX gets an X grade (worse than an F) for his Wikipedia work. MrX owns many articles and never plays nice with outsiders who edit said articles)

Northbysouthbarnof (Travis has a diaper fetish since he was 14, As a teen, he always waited until his parents left for him to engage in his diaper fetish odyessies which he posted online. Travis now works as a fed for national parks in which he kicks people off of their land just like he kicks Wikipedians off the site. He couldn’t wait to get his topic ban on political articles overturned), 

Philip Cross: Neocon imperialist Philip Cross has an anti left wing bias 

non Liberal 2.0 Wikipedians 

CLC Student (great rcp vandal fighter)

Crowsnest/Jakeisasellot (Wikipedia sucks poster and transit worker), Icewhiz

Iamreallygoodatcheckers (moderate Chud)

El C, Eric Barbour , Kumioko ,L293D , Larry Sanger ,Masem , MONGO ,Mr Ernie, Pudeo,  Winkelvi

Wikipedians who blurs the line between Liberal 2.0 and non Liberal 2.0 : Andrevan, Cullen326 (Sierra Club leader, the wise elder, former hippie), Czello (likes instruments, vandal fighting and pov talk and long walks on the beach)

David Gerard (David Gerard is like the resident mascot for Wikipedia and he loves stirring up madness)

Fae, Flyer22, 

GorillaWarfare Molly is a hacker which is base. She edits far right and right wing extremist in a fair and level headed way, she is anti bitcoin which is contrarian so also base and so she should be commended for all of that. She is though Center Left so she might have numerous Liberal 2.0 views (including wrongly deleting the pro traditional marriage UBX) 

Levivich , 

Slimvirgin

Hillbilly Holiday (now a Wikipediocracy power admin)

See this,and this for more. Wikipedia only uses Liberal 2.0 sources and rejects non Liberal 2.0er sources (it rejects non Liberal 2.0 sources like Newsweek, the Grayzone, RT, the Daily Mail, NY Post, Medium, The Epoch Times, Occupy Democrats, Zero Hedge, International Business Times, Media Bias Fact Check, The Post Millennial, The Babylon Bee, The Onion, Quilette, The Global Times and Gawker)

Wikipedia is not an accurate source of information , students should never use it for research and Wikipedia isn’t anywhere near being the most ‘trusted source on the internet’ LOL. 

The Liberal 2.0 MSM love Wikipedia because Wikipedia parrots their deceit on topics like: 

Russia-Ukraine (Wikipedia denies that there are separatists in Ukraine), the kids in cages-family separation double standard hysteria (Yes Trump is anti migrant but Wikipedia ignored that there were also ‘kids in cages’ under former President Barack Obama and now under Joe Biden), Wikipedia exaggerating those immigration detention areas by falsely calling them ‘concentration camps’ (those detention centers were harsh but they were not ‘concentration camps’ , Wikipedia similarly exaggerating January 6 2021 by falsely comparing it to 9/11, Pearl Harbor (thousands of Americans died in those two attacks) and JFK’s assignation, Wikipedia being Anti Communist, Wikipedia being anti bitcoin, Wikipedia’s coverage on China’s abuse of the Uyghurs, Wikipedia being anti Brexit, Wikipedia being Transphobic, Wikipedia being Anti Bernie Sanders, Wikipedia being Anti Jeremy Corbyn, Wikipedia being biased in both directions on Israel-Palestine in opposite ways that I am etc and a few other topics (you can get a clue of what those topics are from my blog)

Wikipedia is also bias in favor of Zoophilia, Pedophilia, drugs, etc

Wikipedia doesn’t have enough LGBTQ coverage (like on Queer Neutrality, Gender voluntarism etc) which is proof that Wikipedia also has a heteronormative and cisgender centric bias . 

I was a Gender gap task force member, Rollbacker, New Page Reviewer, Pending Changes Reviewer, and Articles for Creation reviewer for almost a year on Wikipedia. I saw enough much Liberal 2.0 bias by users and on Wikipedia I had to quit. 

I am also a Wikipedia lurker on that site and I know most power users and admins and their backstories and feuds on that site (like Neelix’s redirect trolling where they needed to create a bot to delete his trollish redirects, vandal fighting admin Edgar181’s sockpuppeting, Dreadstar quitting due to him getting heat for RIGHTFULLY unblocking Mark Bernstein who was the victim of a senseless block, that Northbysouthbarnof has a diaper fetish

Wikipedia co founder Jimbo Wales is married to former UK PM Tony Blair's former diary secretary 

Tony and Cherie attended the wedding. The scandals of Wikipedia’s neocon/anti-Jeremy Corbyn/pro-Israeli bias has already been exposed in the UK, where ocd editors (like Philip Cross) were writing combative entries on any and all critics of government foreign policy. https://wikipedia.fivefilters.org/

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/.  https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/04/information-wars/

https://www.thecanary.co/discovery/analysis-discovery/2018/05/23/the-philip-cross-scandal-how-wikipedia-is-being-used-against-left-wing-journalists/

https://www.medialens.org/2018/caught-in-the-cross-hairs-media-lens-and-the-mystery-of-the-wikipedia-editor/

Kate Garvey, Jimbo Wales wife (their courtship began in Davos), worked on Live 8 in Tony Blair's attempt to distract from the Gleneagles G8 summit. 

She took up a post within the PR firm Freud Communications and in 2007 she was selected as one of the WEF’s "Young Global Leaders" and she has worked in PR for Bono, the 2012 Summer Olympics, The Blair Faith Foundation and Queen Raina of Jordan. Freud Communications were found to have been editing Wikipedia articles on behalf of clients https://www.prwatch.org/node/6413

It is ironic, hundreds of  Liberal 2.0 Wikipedians came to the rescue of non Liberal 2.0 Fram who was banned for a very non Liberal 2.0 act. 

Andrew Orlowski is correct that Wikipedia is now Wokepedia and by Wikipedia being that way it is a tone deaf disservice to every user

I am against Wikipedia not allowing users to have a userbox on their homepage saying they support traditional marriage. The ubx was on the user’s userpage not in a public area. 

What is truly horrible is that Wikipedia EXPLOITED the 2020 racial unrest stories to delete that ubx and Wikipedia is wrong, evil and repugnant for exploiting that unrest to delete that ubx .

THE RACIAL INJUSTICES STORIES SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN EXPLOITED TO DO DELETE A A PRO TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE UBX . 

HAVING A PRO TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE UBX IS NOWHERE NEAR AS BAD OR BIGOTED AS BEING RACIST OR ANTI BLACK AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS A RETARD SOY BOY BETA CUCK. Wikipediamorons

That ubx is provocative but deleting and banning that userbox is worse than that userbox itself. If Wikipedia either deletes all political ubxes or allows a straight pride userbox, I will then be ok with the traditional marriage ubx being deleted and banned. Freedom of speech

You're not "welcome" to edit Wikipedia in any even vague sense of the word. To even begin to contribute to Wikipedia without getting your edits immediately reverted, you must get acquainted with the byzantine bureaucracy of editing. 

Then, you must to hope to the high heavens that your chosen topic is not the private fiefdom of or more turboautists who will spend more editing time than you believed was humanly possibly fighting to keep exclusive control of said article. If anything, new contributors on Wikipedia are on average decidedly unwelcome, often seen as clueless interlopers trespassing on the pristine domain of whichever self-appointed priestly caste that has taken over any given domain

 See more here

etc