Omniliberalism believes in the core principles of liberalism, freedom and equality, whilst believing in elements of other ideologies in a pragmatic way
I don’t find the race concept to be useful. I tend to use African American and black interchangeably in this blog From Rationalwiki “ Modern scientific consensus is strongly against the race concept, though this was not always the case. In contrast, biological evidence for racialism has always been relatively weak, and modern evidence conclusively shows that racialism is fundamentally flawed. Scientific consensus: Races aren't useful “”[B]oundaries in global variation are not abrupt and do not fit a strict view of the race concept; the number of races and the cutoffs used to define them are arbitrary. The race concept is at best a crude first-order approximation to the geographically structured phenotypic variation in the human species. —biological anthropologist John Relethford in 2009 Major institutions with expertise have come down against the biological usefulness of race: “”DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. W...
Unlike in China, there would be a People’s Democracy which would allow multiclass and multi party democracy along the path to socialism. Low class, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie would also be allowed to participate in this greater proletarian movement that would be determined by and part of a broad social base that would underline peaceful socialist revolutions. This is because the People’s Democracy recognizes that the working class are not necessarily an impediment, and could be used to mobilize and serve as the basis for building a state that as mentioned below has corporatist elements that would align labor interests with at least a large sect of the national bourgeoisie to promote a Civic Patriotic Collectivism-Communitarian agenda as mentioned below Leadership positions would be held by the Communist and labor parties, to build more cohesion these parties would merge with our Social Democrat parties on the basis of Marxism Leninism In a Post Den...
ttp://aia.mahost.org/sec_defense.html Bloodthirst ery time I have helped in a demonstration of self-defense, there is one person who ALWAYS says, “But I could never do that to anyone!” What they are thinking is, “I couldn’t ever put someone’s eye out!” The problem is, they aren’t thinking beforehand: “Could I do that to stop someone else from hurting me? From hurting someone I care about?” That’s the real question. When we are talking about self-defense, we are NOT talking about picking fights, walking up to someone and beating them up, or what¬ ever -- we are talking about doing what you have to, to stop someone else from hurting you or someone you care about. It wasn’t YOUR choice to be forced to defend your¬ self. The other person made their choice to hurt you - but your body is YOURS, and NO ONE has the right to control you -- to hurt you. You DO...
Comments
Post a Comment