Political positions

Q) What does 'fourth political position' or 'fifth political position' or 'sixth political position’ , ‘seventh political position’ etc mean?

A)  A Fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh etc political position is a political stance/position on issues that is neither support, against, neutral, left wing-liberal-progressive, conservative-right wing, centrist, indifferent, apolitical or 3rd political position (which is a different concept entirely)  but a hypothetical, political stance/political position that is as opposite of support and against as support and against are opposite of each other and is as opposite of left wing and right wing as left wing and right wing are opposite of each other. 

Fourth political position, fifth political position, sixth political position, seventh political position etc on political issues have never been seen before in our universe but those political stances/positions exists on political issues in other universes with different laws of nature than in our universe (just like there are primary colors that have never been seen in our universe but exist in other universes). 

So we people of our universe, trying to imagine what a fourth political position, fifth political position, sixth political position, seventh political position etc on an issue is, is like us people in our universe trying to imagine a hypothetical primary color that we have never seen before and that doesn't exist in our universe but that exists in other universes, that is as opposite of blue, red and yellow as blue, red and yellow are opposite of each other.  

However, fourth political position, fifth political position, sixth political position, seventh political position etc are not the same, they are also as opposite of each other as support and against are opposite of each other and liberal-progressive and conservative are opposite of each other. 

Like maybe being Eight political position on whether to legalize hard drugs would mean you literally want hard drugs to be legal and illegal at the same time by making our universe adopt other universe’s weird laws of nature (using universe terraforming) that literally allow contradictions to simultaneously exist at the same time

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My real ethnicity views

I don’t find the race concept to be useful. I tend to use African American and black interchangeably in this blog  From Rationalwiki “ Modern scientific consensus is strongly against the race concept, though this was not always the case. In contrast, biological evidence for racialism has always been relatively weak, and modern evidence conclusively shows that racialism is fundamentally flawed. Scientific consensus: Races aren't useful “”[B]oundaries in global variation are not abrupt and do not fit a strict view of the race concept; the number of races and the cutoffs used to define them are arbitrary. The race concept is at best a crude first-order approximation to the geographically structured phenotypic variation in the human species. —biological anthropologist John Relethford in 2009 Major institutions with expertise have come down against the biological usefulness of race: “”DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. W...
Read more

Exh econmc

Unlike in China, there would be a People’s Democracy which would allow multiclass and multi party democracy along the path to socialism.  Low class, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie would also be allowed to participate in this greater proletarian movement that would be determined by and part of a broad social base that would underline peaceful socialist revolutions. This is because the People’s Democracy recognizes that the working class are not necessarily an impediment, and could be used to mobilize and serve as the basis for building a state that as mentioned below has corporatist elements that would align labor interests with at least a large sect of the national bourgeoisie to promote a Civic Patriotic Collectivism-Communitarian agenda as mentioned below   Leadership positions would be held by the Communist and labor parties, to build more cohesion these parties would merge with our Social Democrat parties on the basis of Marxism Leninism In a  Post Den...
Read more

RP

A big tent/syncretic Republican Party that as a whole would be like how Chris Christie wants to rebrand the modern Republican Party   A Republican Party whose ideology is State  Liberal   (Auth right,   reddit Neoliberal  /  reddit State Liberalism , with some crossover with Liberalism 2.0) ,  Progressive Conservativism  and  VanLib   A Republican Party who is as non Christian/Agnostic as the Alt lite was/is non Christian/Agnostic
Read more