Fiscal

I am a Fourth Political Theorist, Left Libertarian/Libertarian Socialist (including Left Social Democrat i.e. pre policy regime SocDem and Liberal Socialist SocDem), Minarchist, Mutualist, Anti Neoliberal (Post Neoliberal)  

I support Social (Democracy) Libertarianism i.e SocBert (Austromarxism, Nordic Model-Third Way, Left SocDem including pre policy regime SocDem and Liberal Socialism), Left Libertarian Socialism (Libertarian MarxismMarxism including Autonomism, Rev Spontex, Austromarxism, fringe ideas and or core tenants from Luxemburgian People’s Democracy Marxism Leninism), Anarchism without Adjectives/Minarchism including Market-oriented left libertarianism, Left Wing Free market anarchist-anarchistic socialism, Left Rothbardianism, Inclusive Democracy/Progressive Utilization theory)

I prefer to be referred to as a Left Libertarian or Social (Democrat) Libertarian/Left Social Democrat instead of a ‘Socialist’ , Communist’ or a Alt Left Capitalism sympathizer

I want the US to either take a Liberal Socialism, Austromarxism/Fourth Political Theory (4pt) or Libertarian Marxism(Luxemburgian [DotP])/People’s Democratic (Vanguard) or Autonomous Radical Democracy (DotP)/Anarcho Syndicalist (Vanguard) transitional path to a Left Libertarian Minarachism Marxism Leninism (Progressive Utilization theory)  society 

OR

I want the US to take an Autonomism, Rev Spontex, Left Libertarianism/Libertarian Socialism: (Anarcho Libertarian, [anarchist-anarchistic socialism,Market-oriented left libertarianism-Left Wing Free market Anarchism, Liberal Socialism, Mutualism) transitional path to an libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society (Inclusive Democracy)  

I expand on this here

If we must stay in our static Capitalistic economy and cannot transition to socialism, we should aim for sovereign processes that limits the power of finance, transform production, ensure a wide wealth mutualistic predistribution and push for a more democratic configuration of our institutions.  

I would thus bite the bullet and settle either for Super Collective Capitalism (SupColCap) or the Nordic Model as the easiest and closet approximation to this , which I outline here

Of course, there is a creative method we can use to force our country to be socialistic : Left Acceleration 

Left Acceleration means by accelerating Capitalism to it's absolute lowest point, a true socialistic society can finally pursue (in a way that would make Ayn Rand proud. Ayn Rand said that the moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness [i.e rational egoism] and that the only social system consistent with this type of morality is a system that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire economic liberalism i.e freedom of economics)

This is because a full maturation of capitalism is the precondition for a socialist realization . To quote Rosa L “ Capitalism, as a result of its own inner contradictions, moves toward a point when it will be unbalanced, when it will simply become impossible” 

The highest stage of development Capitalism would need to become a singular aspect of all of society and develop so extremely that our society does a 180 to become a Left Wing socialistic society 

Socioeconomic 

See here

Institutions  

See here

Economic hypothesis 

See here

Property

See here

Values 

See here

  





. 



  .

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My real ethnicity views

I don’t find the race concept to be useful. I tend to use African American and black interchangeably in this blog  From Rationalwiki “ Modern scientific consensus is strongly against the race concept, though this was not always the case. In contrast, biological evidence for racialism has always been relatively weak, and modern evidence conclusively shows that racialism is fundamentally flawed. Scientific consensus: Races aren't useful “”[B]oundaries in global variation are not abrupt and do not fit a strict view of the race concept; the number of races and the cutoffs used to define them are arbitrary. The race concept is at best a crude first-order approximation to the geographically structured phenotypic variation in the human species. —biological anthropologist John Relethford in 2009 Major institutions with expertise have come down against the biological usefulness of race: “”DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. W...
Read more

Exh econmc

Unlike in China, there would be a People’s Democracy which would allow multiclass and multi party democracy along the path to socialism.  Low class, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie would also be allowed to participate in this greater proletarian movement that would be determined by and part of a broad social base that would underline peaceful socialist revolutions. This is because the People’s Democracy recognizes that the working class are not necessarily an impediment, and could be used to mobilize and serve as the basis for building a state that as mentioned below has corporatist elements that would align labor interests with at least a large sect of the national bourgeoisie to promote a Civic Patriotic Collectivism-Communitarian agenda as mentioned below   Leadership positions would be held by the Communist and labor parties, to build more cohesion these parties would merge with our Social Democrat parties on the basis of Marxism Leninism In a  Post Den...
Read more

RP

A big tent/syncretic Republican Party that as a whole would be like how Chris Christie wants to rebrand the modern Republican Party   A Republican Party whose ideology is State  Liberal   (Auth right,   reddit Neoliberal  /  reddit State Liberalism , with some crossover with Liberalism 2.0) ,  Progressive Conservativism  and  VanLib   A Republican Party who is as non Christian/Agnostic as the Alt lite was/is non Christian/Agnostic
Read more