Womens Issues and mens issues

 Womens issues 

abortion

I am 'Pro Life' in the sense I am against the Death Penalty (though I am sure there has to be '1 or 2' cases where its justified) and  I am pro vaxx (but I don't view the pandemic as a political issue). I am however pro choice on abortion (see below)

If abortion is illegal, women will still have abortions and have mostly unsafe abortions . Moreover many to most women who have abortions end up having children anyway after their abortion, and many of those women who have children after their abortion, end up having more children than they would have if they didn't have their abortion.

BECAUSE of those 2 facts, I am pro choice or to put it another way I support the rights of women to not have unsafe abortions (which would happen if abortion was illegal), the unborn rights of babies who would be aborted in a world where abortion was illegal but wouldn't be aborted in a world where abortion was legal and the rights of future unborn children of mothers who had abortions before they were born who would not have been born if their mothers didn't have an abortion.

I am also pro choice because I know that banning abortion won't stop abortions

My mother had toxemia when she was pregnant with me. Because of that and despite what I wrote above, you can say that personally I am probably systematically slightingly pro life (slightingly in this case being technically being Pro Life but still appearing to be Pro Choice like how a temperature that appears to be below Absolute Zero is still above Absolute Zero)  and legality wise me being between very deep down inside and subcounsciously neutral to somewhat barely lean pro life 

I have no issues with people who are Pro Life. I also feel that the documentary Unplanned makes good points on the abortion issue that I feel the pro choice crowd has no current sufficent counter arguements for.

We need to open more adoption centers nationwide

I trust that natural reason and logic set forth by our creator systematically will continue to guide women to make the best decisions for themselves in terms of abortion

For 2nd trimester abortion, personally and legality wise, I am pro choice. But I support a lot of second trimester pregnancy crisis centers opened throughout the US etc to encourage pregnant women who are in their second trimester only to keep their babies.

However, I feel that for 2nd trimester abortion only, I wonder how viable it would be to have a compassionate approach of creating a culture that encourages Americans to cover have their bases more whenever they make a decision that is similar to whether or not a woman should have an abortion in her 2nd semester (decisions also like deciding whether or not to drop out of 4 year college to get a job or to finish 4 year college and then go to grad school regardless if they decide late to drop out of grad school), deciding during Blackjack whether to hit after the first card up that was dealt didn't reach 21 (but that card number is in the upper 10s or 20), as a musician deciding to continue the 2nd leg of a tour, extend the tour past the 2nd leg, or go to a final leg of the tour, and similar decisions where people have to decide whether to keep going with something they are doing or to stop doing that thing they are doing before reaching the final leg of what they are doing

This would be accomplished by the government and or NGOs adding decision making classes like Managing Emotions in Times of Uncertainty & Stress, Effective Problem Solving and Decision Making, Decision Making Blending Art & Science, Decision Making and Scenarios to k-12 schools (which are existing types of courses in colleges but would be modified to deal with the types of decision making where people have to decide whether to keep going with something they are doing or to stop doing that thing they are doing before reaching the final leg of what they are doing, just like women having to decide during the 2nd trimester whether to have an abortion or not). There would also need to be changes to the above courses to comply with k-12 grade standards of teaching since those courses are currently taught beyond high school. Doctors would also be trained to have this type of decision making skills as mentioned above.

Moreover this approach would include training for workers (especially people in the health industry) to put more emphasis on teamwork and helping others who indecisive make the right decision on the types of decisions where people have to decide whether to keep going with something they are doing or to stop doing that thing they are doing before reaching the final leg of what they are doing

In addition to creating more programs between churches and their church members and patients to meet during the week (but in ways I could live with) in order to help people with the types of decision making where people have to decide whether to keep going with something they are doing or to stop doing that thing they are doing before reaching the final leg of what they are doing. Doctors would also

This new pro 2nd tier decision making culture for all Americans I'd want to create, would then hopefully indirectly as possible encourage pregnant women in their 2nd trimesters who are seeking an abortion to first have careful consideration and consultation with properly trained and oriented people like their families, physicians and clergy on their decision before deferring to themselves and their doctors to make that decision.

Personally and legality wise, I lean against third trimester abortion being legal except for rape, incest, to save the life of the mother and for extremely rare and very severe medical cases

Personally, I fluidly oscillate between sixth political position , neutral lean pro choice and zero tolerant pro choice (pro choice with zero tolerance for pro life view on this specific issue) on whether I believe that third trimester abortion should be legal for rape, incest or to save the life of the mother. Legality wise I am always pro choice on third trimester abortion for babies conceived via rape and incest and to save the life of the mother. However if I was in my mom's belly and I was concieved via rape or incest, in that situation I'd obviously be pro life (since I'd want to be born)

On the issue of parental consent for minors getting abortions, I oscillate between being between neutral and Conservative Liberal and being pragamtically far left (for the latters it due to youth rights mostly) 

I begrudingly and with a heavy heart support parental notification laws (which notify the parent if their child is considering an abortion)

I will not condemn Texas's new abortion laws, but at the same time I think they went too far and we need people like Wendy Davis to help fight this law (with Wendy Davis's ideas)

Instead of criticizing Texas's new abortion laws people should try to help women who want an abortion not have unsafe abortions and help women who wouldn't have had an abortion under that old laws to not have an abortion due to these news laws.

My thoughts on Roe v Wade being overturned can be found here

I pragmatically lean tepid support for the Hyde Amendment if for no other reason because I am a Libertarian. If i was forced to choose an alternative to the Hyde Amendment I'd give strong consideration with the idea of implementing limited Humanistic/Compassionate Capitalism for areas with a lot of poor women who can't afford abortions. This limited Humanistic/Compassionate Capitalism would then lift those poor women who can't afford abortions up financially so they'd be able to afford abortions without having to use the Hyde Amendment to do that. It would be more of a stimulus that would keep stimulating those areas til they were as fiscally stable as most of the country, state or region.

I believe that it should be illegal for employers to require their workers to be pro choice 

I am against Justin Trudeau going after pro life charities and pro life groups. Trudeau is wrong for doing that and proves he is a hypocrite on abortion since he doesn't trust women to make their own decision. 

I believe that kids should learn sex education before graduating elementary school and continue to learn it as preteens and teens. This would help kids, preteens and teens know not to become pregnant, to use common sense and have more anticonceptive access which should be easier for them to get.

Women should have easy access to Misoprostol for up to the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

I believe that babies who survive an abortion should be required by law to get medical care if there is more than a reasonable doubt that they could be saved and live a normal life.

In addition, along with sex education, I'd also want kids, preteens and teens to to be taught abstinence (I am Pro Abstinence) 

I am against partial birth abortion and live birth abortion being legal even for babies conceived via rape and incest (with the condition the mother is given extreme counciling and consolation for the whole ordeal)

As long as health care providers provide resources to help pregnant women who are pregnant with a baby with down syndrome raise their baby with down syndrome,  personally and systematically, I basically support laws making it harder (as in abortion in Texas new pro life law hard, but not illegal)  for pregnant women to abort babies with down syndrome if their reason for aborting that baby is because the baby has down syndrome.  However, legality wise, I am Christian Democratic on this issue

I support birth control being legal

I am neutral to lean conditionally support on whether I believe that health care providers should be required to offer free birth control

I support vitro fertilization and egg transplants if that can comply with Christianity, otherwise, I am alt apolitical lean fourth political position on that issue

I support Stem Cell research as a necessary evil

I am against population control. The government should not have any say in a womans sex life. How many kids a woman has or whether she has kids is her decision to make not the Governments decision. Population control is an assault on reproductive rights and it doesn't stop Climate Change. Moreover, overpopulation (the other rationale for it) is a myth.  China should be condemned for their brutal 1-2-3 child policies (China should have known better). Population control is a human rights violation (right to procreate). Human life is sacred. Stopping people from being born is literally the worst way to fight Climate Change and is counterproductive too.  Population control is a Conservatives dream because it makes Liberals/Democrats who support Population control look like hypocrites on abortion and similar issues. If Liberals/Democrats want to feed that conservative wet dream by supporting it, then they (Liberals/Democrats) deserve all the conservative blowback they get for it

Feminism

I support JK Rowling type postfeminism which includes using judicial reform to eliminate patriarchy from the legal system.  This allows for the true emancipation of women from traditional social inferiority and economic exploitation. This means society should collectively assume the roles that mothers and wives were traditionally assigned (via remove private property and a classless society). 

The above changes will also liberate all sexists and misogynists from their sexism and misogyny . The above changes will also help people not end up like this former liberal by making it impossible to be sexist or misogynist in the first place

But there are a few feminist things that I am not down with  (like that Lego complaint years ago by feminists, or the view by feminists that all men are rapists, or feminists saying that that video game designer from Puerto Rico was misogynist or should be fired for his gamer gate comments or feminists downplaying the evil extremism of Valerie Solanas, or the criticism of Jurassic World by some feminists, feminists complaining about urinals fringe things like that I disagree with feminists on)

I support Kim Possible type of girl power. We guys have always have been chivalarous to women and supporting Girl Power is a new supplement to that. Girl Power is a fun form of liberal feminism. Right Wing Marxists created Male Supremacy so this is a good counter to it

I believe the 1970s 1980s Equal Rights Amendment (without the pro LGBTQ elements) should have been part of the US constitution from 1776 onwards (and the European empire constitution from the end of the French Revolution and onward) , which would meant women would have had the type of equity and parity in the US , Europe and European colonies from the 1770s onward that the 1970s 1980s Equal Rights Amendment wanted woman to have. Moreover women in all countries on Earth should of had the same equality to men from the middle ages- medieval time period through the 1760s that females have in RPG games where women have equity to males (like Final Fantasy series, Dragon Quest series, Fire Emblem series etc)

Women should always get paid equally to men (and I'd have no issue if they were paid more than men though as long as it wasn't for woke like reasons). I support income equality

Women are as good if not better than men at working because women bring sensitivity, compassion, their own unique brand of creativeness and similar qualities to jobs they do. Margaret Thatcher said it best “If you want something said, ask a man; if you want something done, ask a woman.

I support women's suffrage 

I think Prostitution should be something between being illegal and decriminalized for buyers.  Sex workers should never get in trouble for prostitution . At worst sex workers should be given counciling to guide them away from it (though I admit I sympathize with the legalized Prostution movement solely because I get annoyed/triggered hearing people virtue signaling about how evil prostutition is)  .I am still against Prostutition however

The 1991 Oregon study of prostitution show alarming statistics for why sex work has serious drawbacks for sex workers

That Slate columnist did nothing wrong by sharing tips about Wikipedia controversies with another reporter or by mentioning the relationship status of that reporter.

I was a Wikipedia editor and a member of Women in Red and the Gender Gap task force. I created many articles of females on Wikipedia and improved countless other female articles on Wikipedia in order to give more coverage of women on Wikipedia. I also helped female Wikipedia editors when they needed it

I do not agree with things in the Wikipedia article about Gender Bias on Wikipedia. In my opinion, no one is stopping women from becoming Wikipedia editors and writing articles about women or other subjects. It is just as easy for women to jump in and become regular Wikipedia editors as it is for men to do so.

I am a anti sexual abuse activist.  I also am a fan of Law and Order SVU and applaud their activism

There is nothing wrong with a husband or wife kissing their spouse or child on the head while they are sleeping.

While I somewhat sympathize with the European Muslim refugees and migrants in Europe who are convicted of sexual abuse, I believe that they shouldn't get less punishment than non Muslims get for sex crimes. They should however be voluntarily educated about sex crimes so there is no excuse.

Women should forgive the men who sexually abused them. Forgiveness is a virtue. God says to forgive since we are all sinners and he forgives us. Moreover, I am against guilty til proven innocent mindset within the MeToo movement, which includes men being tried in the court of public opinion instead of the courtroom (or before the courtroom) . This along with the hypocrisy in the movement triggers me.

Men's issues

I believe that while individual women/women as a whole might have prejudicial biases towards specific men or toward men as a whole, it is done without the backing of a societal system of institutional power

I sympathize with the documentary the Red Pill and its message

Chris Pratt's Instagram post about his wife was not sexist. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to get a clue.

I have no real issues with Josh Hawley's speech 'Men and the Future of America'.  I don't care for the speech but it is what it is

I believe there is nothing wrong with men showing chivalry to women. Chivalry is not sexist.

I am almost conditionally fine with Masculinity in at least more than a few cases (and possibly more cases).  I really don't care for Toxic Masculinity (but Toxic Masculinity is not an issue that keeps me up at night)

The best way for women to deal with Male Chauvinist pigs is to kick the **** out of those Male Chauvinists in a unsanctioned MMA type fight or to OWN those Male Chavuinists at sports like Billie Jean King did to Bobby Riggs in 1971.

Relational issues 

I believe that people should marry others who have more than a lot of things in common with them.  It's vital that people marry other people who share most (or nearly most) of their political views. Why would Democrats-Liberals and Progressives want to have their children inherit Republican-Conservative traits from a Republican-Conservative parent?

I am fine with marriage counseling classes for married couples that are similar to the ones that Will and his fiancé went to with the Jeffersons on the Fresh Prince of Bel Air.

I believe women should beat the **** out of their husbands if their husbands abuse/hurt them or even try to abuse/hurt them. The best way for women to stop domestic violence and abuse is to literally fight back and kick the **** out of their husbands to teach them not to **** with them.

I believe that we should find ways to make adopting children much easier than it is now and to strongly encourage more people to adopt children

Some of my friends from years back became members of Promise Keepers. I believe that Promise Keepers are not a sexist (or if they are its due to ignorance) or a chauvinistic organization. They are right about more than a few things, and some things they are not right about.  We can find some salvagable things about them

I am between third political position -open minded mixed and lean lukewarm support for what Matthew Dowd said when he said that liberals who did sexual assault should be viewed in a different light (but not necessarily less harshly than) as conservatives who committed sexual assault (due to the fear of it being counterproductive). Dowd says "Every leader (and each of us) is human and flawed and makes mistakes, but there is a difference between those (liberals like Al Franken, George Takei) who are flawed who work for the common good (like womens' rights and reproductive health) and those who are flawed who could care less about the common good (conservatives like Roy Moore, Donald Trump). Huge difference"  

I believe that a husband has an equal role to lead his household in a loving and gentle way, giving his life to his wife (like how Christ gave his life to the Church by dying) so she (the wife) can in her equal role willingly submit to her husband's leadership (both the husband and wife are equal, but have different equal roles, just like what Ghazela Khan said on Morning Joe)

Similar to the Apostle Paul, I believe that for singles it is good for them to remain single unless they cannot self control in which case they should get into a romantic relationship (its better to get into a romantic relationship than to burn with lust) I believe this because single people have more time and freedom to help make our world more progressive, and due to me believing that romantic relationships are more a forced social construct, even more so than marriages and I hate forced social constructs.   

In light of that, I would be open to the government creating a romantic relationship tax which heavily taxes Americans (of all sexual orientations) who are in a romantic relationship. However, once they get married or they became single again, that tax would be eliminated unless they get into another romantic relationship again.  Unlike Paul, I believe that marriages give people a lot more freedom today to make the world a better place than it was during Paul's time, almost as much freedom as singles in Paul's day had for themselves.   If this tax had the negative side effect of causing less births (which I don't want since I am against Population control), then I would be against this tax unless I found some way to have this tax be legal while at the same time not causing less births.  If this idea I have caused less births, then to offset it, I'd want the government to give tax breaks to families who have kids, and the more kids families they have, the more tax breaks they get (until the birth rate goes back to before this system was implemented)