Fiscal views

My fiscal views 

I really don't have any firm fiscal views. I do tend to have a combination of the fiscal views below if need be  

I am a Tankie (Marxist-Leninist), Social Democrat (pre policy regime and especially the mid to late 1910s European variety of SocDem), Anarcho Libertarian/social Anarcho Syndicalist (NON Anarcho Capitalism Anarcho Libertarian) and a Peronist. 

I support Anarcho Monarchism in some specific places and situations 

I support the Labour Party UK (New Labour/Momentum/J Corbynism) 

My combined economic views can be best described either as a mix of USSR like planned economy (ie like the one under Marxism-Leninism/Josef Stalin)/Multipolar Organic sociological Socialism and the type of retroactive hypothetical Capitalism that would have existed in the US in the early to early mid 20th century IF that early to early mid 20th century retroactive hypothetical US Capitalism was a fusion of Humanistic/Compassionate Capitalism and Inclusive Capitalism/the democracy that the United States has managed since FDR (and that was noticeably growing stronger in the early 2000s and is still growing stronger today)

expanded fiscal/ Labor /Gov/

I am a Marxist Leninist because of how good it worked in the USSR . I like USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism AND  post Dengist Marxism Leninism  (like in modern China) equally

I want either the US to quickly become a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) without a transitioning to that system (since it is very easy for the US to quickly become a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society [like in modern China] as opposed to how very hard it would be for the US to quickly become a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society)

OR

for the US to transition to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society and eventually transition further to an Anarcho Syndicalist and finally a Communistic society (which would be a better end goal than a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society [like in modern China]’s end goal)

Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) (like in modern China):

Unlike in China, there would be a People’s Democracy which would allow multiclass and multi party democracy along the path to socialism. Low class, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie would also be allowed to participate in this greater proletarian movement that would be determined by and part of a broad social base that would underline peaceful socialist revolutions.

This is because the People’s Democracy recognizes that the working class are not necessarily an impediment, and could be used to mobilize and serve as the basis for building a state that as mentioned below has corporatist elements that would align labor interests with at least a large sect of the national bourgeoisie to promote a Civic Patriotic Collectivism-Communitarian agenda as mentioned below  

Leadership positions would be held by the Communist and labor parties, to build more cohesion these parties would merge with our Social Democrat parties on the basis of Marxism Leninism

In a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) there would be a people centered approach for the public interest (improving people's lives and well being as the primary goal of development and the mediation of tensions between the societal classes, with the state responsible for negotiating compromise in worker-boss conflicts latter) government leadership, continuing deepening reforms and an open shared development that is innovative, coordinated, and green, people would be the ‘masters’ of the country (with Kids being the only ‘privileged’ class). This system would balance the right of the individual and society 

In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) would have state owned assets, collectively owned enterprises and the publicly owned shares of mixed enterprises . 

This would result in a highly diffused form of public ownership where state owned enterprises are owned by some different government entities, agencies and other state owned enterprises. The government would command over and majorly regulate virtually all sectors of a market-based economy. Like in Peronism this would be a centralized government, with an organized State and a free people. It would be a political, economic and social doctrine

These commercial enterprises would be established by either our central government or by a local government, where the managers are appointed by the government or public bodies. This would include wholly state funded and managed firms. Most of these state owned enterprises are not entities of the central government, they would be subunits of the State owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC).

In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) enterprises who are held by the state would be publicly listed firms where the state would own a large or controlling share within the firms, thereby they would exert influence on the firm’s management. This would include firms that receive foreign direct investment.

SOEs would be much larger in size but fewer in number than State Held Enterprises, with the central government-p owned SOEs being clustered in strategic sectors that would include banking, finance, mining, energy, transportation, telecommunications and public utilities. More local level SOEs would number in the thousands or or near a thousand and would be involved in almost every industry including information technology and auto design/production..

The centrally owned SOEs would pursue national and industrial policy objectives.

SOEs would be encouraged and even required to pay a higher portion of their profits as dividends to the state. Some state owned assets would be transferred to social security funds to help elderly finance pensions.

In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) , privately owned enterprises (POEs) would be recognized as one of the components of this socialist market economy along with state, collective and individually owned enterprises. 

The private sector would play an increasingly bigger role than it did in the 1990s in China

The boundary between public and private enterprises would be blurred as many publicly listed firms would be under mixed ownership by various state and non state entities. Private sector firms (in targeted growth industries) would often receive favorable loans and preferential government treatment in this future economy that operate in industries targeted for growth with SOEs in non strategic sectors being exempt from subsidies. 

Some select large corporations would be nationalized in a way that blurred distinctions between corporations and government.So there would be a corporatist element to this system. 

One way to describe at least a small labor aspect of this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) system would it is in at least small part an alliance between the trade unions and the caudillos

In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) , indicative planning and industrial policies would substitute material balance planning and play a key role in guiding our market economy for the state and private sectors. This planning system would consist of three layers, each using a different planning mechanism.

Market relations and markets would become the instrumental driving force in this socialist market economy.

Compulsory planning would be limited to state owned enterprises that would operate in strategic sectors, that would include research, education and infrastructure development plans. 

This type of Compulsory planning would outline targeted outcomes and the raw material supply of raw and financial resources that would be needed. 

Contractual planning would set objectives and the overall means of achieving these planned goals and then the negotiation would happen with enterprises and local governments to create and implement detailed objectives on how resources to targeted sectors would be allocated

This Indicative planning would operate at the lowest planning system level, where the government would outline industrial targets and then use the market instruments (like tax exemptions, subsidies and favorable bank loans) to entice targeted firms to meet these targets

In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) workers' unions are under state management (but some of them would be corporate instead but cede much freedom to strike in exchange for the state assuming the role of negotiator between conflicting interests) there would be healthcare that is between the free healthcare under Peronism and the current healthcare model in China, modern China like welfare,  a progressive tax code, (with the lowest bracket being 3 percent and the highest bracket being 45 percent) . It would subsidize electric vehicles, implement a public bike system that would be run by several companies

In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) , low income housing projects would be created and workers' recreation centers would be created throughout the US. 

Workers would get more paid days off than white collar workers currently do in the UK (regardless if those days off are used for vacation trips or just taking a break from work), jobs would pay half the money of their employees medical related trips and moving expenses

There would be more worker co-ops than there is now and for those worker co-op workers only there would be more paid vacation benefits than in the US and UK. 

There would also be raised minimum wage and safety regulations along with a more inclusive SSI system 

In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) there would be traditional (like USSR) Marxism Leninism socialist core values as mentioned in the ‘alternative to this’ section below 

USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism

To transition us to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society here are the steps we need to take:

To have a socialistic (USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism) society with productive work forces (which we need) we may need to endure ‘wage slavery’ for a while to get there. Such a denigrated or deformed workers state is great for left acceleration reasons

We would first need to diminish markets that self regulate and scale back free marketism. Free marketism (as in Free Market capitalism) is not something people can rely on even in a transitional phase to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society and it rubs a lot of people the wrong way hence my views on it. We would switch to a centrally planned free marketism which fixes these issues as we transition

Corporations would then be pitted against each other as a way to fix the issues with the State Capitalism transitional part of this phase to USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism and to move us more smoothly to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society since corporate competition empowers the economy and causes class struggle and analysis and I echo that belief 

We would need small businesses forming unions who would operate parallel to each other in business groups (similar to corporatism). This would mean the employees would get a bigger chunk of the profits from their employers via negotiation with each union and its corresponding business group.

They would also get more input from the government or NGOs to ensure more fair labor practices and get our economy stimulated, and to help employers and employees instead of just employees. This essentially would be worker co-ops

This would make businesses stronger as it would build bonds between the employers and their employees ,each with their own unique contributions to make. This essentially would be worker co-ops

This would make it easier to set up revolutionary unions (some guerrilla/underground ones) similar to a Vanguard party organizing the working class defensibly in the case of a counter-revolution through solidarity, direct action

Basically Anarcho Syndicalists operating within autonomous vanguard parties in maybe in this type of way

Eventually the workers would through this path challenge unjust hierarchies and then seize the means of production including property and the functions of the state/bourgeoisie destroying and expropriating these things by the working class and thus would easily create a quick and direct path to abolishing class which it will do after enduring USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism for years, as well as preventing dictatorships from rising by using a dictatorship of the proletariat here (a DotP that is representative of the people and counterposed against the state against any counter revolutionaries/resistance and state bureaucracy)

There might be a traditional DotP here only if it could be set up like democratic workplace confederations and local assemblies that are like a DotP in all but a name

This Anarcho Syndicalist type state would only be temporary as they would then have to a cede to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism system and society . Eventually, down the line, USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism would then transition into a Anarcho Syndicalist society instead of a Communistic one

This is because you can’t create a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society within the confines of capitalism without a DotP, so then the DotP helps in abolishing our capitalistic state structure , our class society and the state so the possibility of a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism state become a reality. 

During this transitional period it will become necessary for anarchists to protect and establish themselves by setting up their management of the economy in order to begin this process of transitioning to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society

In this transition to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society or even in this USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society, I would support fiscally responsible Keynesian government spending (fiscally responsible Keynesianism like the Keynesianism that was employed by GWB and Ronald Reagan or that was employed in the early mid 20th century, i.e Weaponized/Military Keynesianism) on things like public works (i.e Keynesian style of government/deficit spending spending) when the economy needs a boost due to things like inflation, deflation, depressions, recessions using the exact type of) 

In this eventual USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society the USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism would partly be a type with USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism that doesn't have democratic hierarchal structures (i.e has a social scale and has a ‘normative’ Marxist structure of the core inner circle of educated urban intellectuals within the party that has a major say in the working class)

Through this form of USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism, in that USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society, its organization principles, influence within structures and groups that are popular forms a new (post class) society which the party’s body and its appointees have major say in the affairs of the working class

In this eventual USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society the workers would have genuine control over the means of production through institutions such as trade unions while keeping some stake in companies they previously had more control over.  The state would allow the community to own the means of production and provide each of its participants with consumption "according to their needs"

As noted here, in this USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society there would be no racial-ethnic inequality or wealth inequality. Every citizen would have the right (or requirement) to work, and jobs would be allocated by the state, not competed for as they were in the west

This USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society would have a state inducing economy which values privatization (privatization that is a fusion of Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic policy privatization and this type of left wing lockean type privatization) as that is compatible with encouraging competition and can be used to fuel economics in that society

In this USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society,  the production tools be private (privatization that is a fusion of Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic policy privatization and this type of left wing lockean type privatization) while the production is for the betterment of the US instead of personal gain 

As this eventual USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society gives way to more and more Anarchist elements , state and community owned enterprises would eventually operate in unregulated and open Anarchist markets until it allows the workers to once gain full control (including the economy) to eventually end the wage system 

where the workers would be democratically self managed, causing the state and markets to wither away

Classes and hierarchy would be truly and fully be abolished. This would create a smooth transition to an eventual Communistic society which is the end goal of USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism

Maybe hopefully this Communistic society would morph into a society that is a Christian Communist society like in the Book of Acts or in small communes (with some elements of Agrarian Socialism). 

I like an economic system where no matter how much you contribute to that work, you work is valued by the government and country. This work helps you become valued in society

Businesses 

I am pro big business and would want a society that values big business (including bringing Guilds back if there are monopolies and allowing Guilds to be widespread as they were in the Middle Ages, effectively granting these individual guilds in many different industries, especially in the online sphere xi) if we can’t transition to be a Marxist Leninist society

In our current static capitalistic society, I want the US to bridge the gap between small business people and workers via commerce councils

I believe businesses should be able to be assisted for purchasing things for their businesses via tax breaks

I support enterprise zones under our current economical landscape

I am against a 25 dollars or more minimum wage , at least until we are in a non Capitalist economy (especially a Marxist Leninist society). 

I am against occupational licensing requirements for homeowners’ association

I support the rural working class (i.e farmers)

I believe that its better for corporations to voluntarily reform themselves than for them to be forced to do so until we are in our transition phase to a Marxist Leninist society

I want Amazon and Big Tech to be broken up, its time that they end their monopolies and gives people more options to choose from in terms of big tech

Most small businesses are NOT tax cheats and Justin Trudeau was wrong to lie and say that. Just because he was a small business owner doesn't mean he is right

Bank/tax/trade

I generally have a Democrat Party position on the amount of government that should be involved in the economy in a static capitalistic economy  

I support various forms of protectionism

I support fairish trade

I support balanced budgets

The government should not increase the tax of people who profit from the sale of stocks ,bonds or real estate.

I support people having off shore bank accounts as long as they don't abuse them and they aren't given like candy

I'm against President Biden's IRS bank snooping plan and his plan to unprivatize banks

I'd want strict rules preventing fraudulent monetary loans and fraud itself

I always defend bitcoin because I am Libertarian

I support and encourage people to use war bonds, bonds and to save their money (ie thrift and personal savings) in savings accounts. I believe people should go to tax seminars and learn how to save their money and invest.  I also encourage

I support a Bimetal standard being implemented in the US etc, however I would be open to the Gold Standard being brought back if it could be done practically

I support at minimum auditing the Federal Reserve

I do not support the Great Reset

socioec

Having all sociofiscal classes harmonize and not battle in order to together make society grow is also a good thing.  Taxing the rich is good to encourage this system but eventually redistribution of wealth would rightfully be abolished in a Marxist Leninist society

In our current economical landscape and maybe in a socialistic transitional landscape, I support commitment to robust protections for just possessory claims by producing classes. But I believe that protections shouldn’t cover objects with the aid of the state or through violence or that were abandoned or similar just exceptions. This type of system is grounded in common solidarity and Christian Democratic jingoist unity 

Education is important to create a productive society

I support free education to all who qualify and working students should be given one paid week before every major examination but not until we become a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) 

I support the USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism form of free schooling but not until we defeat Capitalism and are in a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society

I don't care for welfare but until we are in either a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China)  or a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism  , and our current static capitalistic society, I would support privatized welfare (but not for people who don't want to work, people who abuse welfare, people who can get better benefits outside of welfare etc) 

In particular through this welfare I support in our current static capitalistic society, it would provide food, shelter and utilities for people in times of need (like winter, or hot summers).  I would want this tougher type of welfare to inspire people to be self sufficient or to work for the good of the community (but still have emergency nets if they couldn't). 

I also want in our current static capitalistic society for semi private charities (privatization part is a fusion of Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic policy privatization and this type of left wing lockean type privatization) set up to help struggling Americans. These charities would rely on private donations from Americans to help other Americans (Americans would be incentivized to do so)

I believe that people ought to be economically self sufficient. To quote the USSR “ Therefore, the ground principle of our society was he/she who does not work, neither shall he eat”

Once we get to our Marxist Leninist society there would be no need for welfare due to Marxist Leninist things like paid maternity leave, free education, free healthcare and free housing which function more as tech breaks and enhancements that would be needed to make the socialistic human workforce to reproduce itself and perform at its zenith. It would not be part of a social contract between the state and citizens..

I support quality housing with affordable pricing

Bernie Sanders, AOC and so called ‘Progressives’ are social fascists because they can’t create a world where everyone who needs insulin can comfortably afford insulin. We need real Left Wing politicans who can create such a world

I believe families should be able to have tax benefits and more flexible dependent laws are created to help families who have significant amount of people living with them

I support some social patriotic pensions 

I support some specific types of socialistic healthcare but I would settle for the type of Democrat Party healthcare that Democrat Party Libertarians support

My views on taxing the rich are based on one or more of my fiscal views that I wrote above

My views on a Universal Basic Income are based on one or more of my fiscal views that I wrote above

My views on Build Back Better are based on one or more of my fiscal views that I wrote above. However I believe infrastructure development should also have indirect incentives including tax reductions with more direct funding in road, rail and other transportation projects.

All student loans should be forgiven -- but that obligation to repay those student loans should be laid upon the colleges that gave those students all those degrees. 

The banking institutions should also be authorized to foreclose on those institutions of higher learning that can't repay and liquidate them. It would have a salutary effect upon American higher education. Then the whole federal loan program should be repealed and liquidated once and for all. 

Antis

I am against Neoliberalism (including Capitalism) as I feel that Neoliberalism has inflamed or caused most of the problems the US is facing today and has negative effects on many people throughout the US. Moreover we have to abolish the Capitalist value system of traditional conservatism to create a less divisive world where we are in control, free of stratified social classes, wedge issues and reactionaries on both sides

I loathe a lot of variants of Communism. 

I am Anti International Communism

values

We citizens reserve the right to question authority

I am a Survivalism enthusiast and I believe that its a good concept to live by

Rich people of all races and ethnicities always unfortunately have advantages over non rich and poor people of all races-ethnicities. My fiscal views above and combined would counteract that and help everyone have a level playing field

I support right to privacy and right to be forgotten 

I am an Individualist 

I am against people having a sense of entitlement 

I am brave, articulate and smart and I believe that those are valuable traits

I support the inalienable right of self preservation of Americans against punitive and unsanctioned control

I believe we and politicians should relate to the common people

The anti authoritarian movement is so over the top and goes too far at times, it makes anti authoritarianism seem like reverse fascism to me

I am against Materialism. Materialism is unneeded. True happiness is not found in Materialism. Materialism is hollow, shallow, greedy and wrong. . The ills of Capitalism have caused Materialism and we need to defeat Capitalism to defeat Materialism

Instead of gaining material wealth people should gain knowledge, life philosophy and other non material and Christian values that the creator set out for us . Materialism makes people unhappier and is wrong. Materialism is tied with envy, possessiveness ,non generosity and those are terrible values.

People can never have enough and that is wrong. This is all due to evil corporations brainwashing people through consumerism, and through things like Globalizationlism and Globalism. People wrongly think they need things they don't need and that so off base. In many religions like Christianity, materialism is a sin (see Jesus's condemnations of Materialism in the Gospels for example). We must end Materialism forever and show people true happiness is non material. See my lifestyle blog for more

I have a Democrat Party position on consumer protection

I am against the Stop Online Piracy Act